Supreme Court backs HMRC In Key VAT Recovery Dispute

Supreme Court backs HMRC In Key VAT Recovery Dispute
Charlotte Baroukh

Charlotte Baroukh

Tax Expert @ Pie

2 min read

Updated: 18 Dec 2025

2 min read

Updated: 18 Dec 2025

Introduction

The Supreme Court has issued a significant decision in favour of His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (HMRC) regarding the recoverability of value added tax (VAT) by Hotel La Tour. The judgment, which clarifies the conditions for VAT deduction when proceeds are used for taxable business activities, resolves a longstanding dispute involving complex aspects of input tax recovery.


The case, closely watched by tax professionals and the hospitality sector, provides new guidance on the limits of recoverable VAT and the requirements established under UK and European law.

Overview of the Dispute

Hotel La Tour, a company within the hospitality industry, sought to recover VAT incurred during the development and subsequent sale of a property. The company argued that the funds raised from this transaction were subsequently invested into another taxable business, asserting they were therefore entitled to recover the input VAT on the original costs.


The disagreement centred around whether VAT incurred for the construction or sale of a capital asset could be recovered on the grounds that it indirectly supported a subsequent VAT-liable activity. This question has been the subject of multiple court reviews prior to the Supreme Court’s involvement.

Legal Basis for the Case

The dispute examined provisions under the UK Value Added Tax Act 1994 as well as the Principal VAT Directive at the European level. Under these guidelines, input VAT may generally be reclaimed if the acquired goods or services are used for taxable business purposes.


Judicial scrutiny focused on the direct and immediate link required between expenditure and taxable outputs. Previous case law in both domestic and European courts provided mixed interpretations, intensifying uncertainty over VAT recovery eligibility in the context of business asset realisation.

Arguments Presented by Hotel La Tour

Hotel La Tour maintained that the proceeds from selling its property were not an end to themselves, but were earmarked for reinvestment in a directly taxable endeavour.


On this basis, the company contended it should be eligible to recover VAT incurred during the course of the initial project. According to publicly available court records, the business emphasised the continuity of its taxable activities, noting that without the sale, it would not have been able to operate the subsequent venture.


The case therefore rested on whether the connection between the initial VAT expense and later taxable use was sufficient for input tax recovery.

HMRC’s Position and Response

HMRC countered that VAT recovery cannot be claimed simply because subsequent proceeds are applied towards a VAT-liable business. Rather, HMRC argued the relevant tax law requires a direct connection between the input costs and taxable outputs at the point of expenditure.


HMRC’s stance reflected a longstanding view that input VAT cannot be reclaimed where the relevant goods or services are linked primarily to exempt activities or non-business disposals, regardless of eventual use of the proceeds.

Supreme Court’s Decision

The Supreme Court ultimately dismissed Hotel La Tour’s appeal, supporting HMRC’s interpretation. The justices ruled the VAT legislation does not allow for input tax recovery in cases where the direct link between expenditure and a taxable supply is insufficient.


Delivering the judgment, the Court reaffirmed the requirement for a ‘direct and immediate’ connection between costs and taxable activities. The fact that sale proceeds are subsequently used for business investment was found not to meet the legislative tests for recoverability.

Final Summary

The Supreme Court’s ruling in the Hotel La Tour case clarifies the UK’s legal position on VAT recovery in circumstances where proceeds from the sale of business assets are later invested in taxable ventures.


The justices’ insistence on a direct connection between expenditure and subsequent taxable supply reinforces HMRC’s approach and restricts businesses from broadening input VAT recovery using future use of funds as justification.


This decision provides essential guidance for both legal practitioners and companies seeking to navigate input VAT rules. For ongoing updates and expert insights on tax compliance, readers can access resources via the Pie app.

Want to get smarter about taxes?

The Tax Pible has tax tips, guides, video tutorials, and expert insights.


Stay up to date with the latest tax news and watch the UKs first tax podcast - the Piecast

Want to get smarter about taxes?
Whatsapp Pie Tax