Why HMRC Is Writing to LLPs
The letters follow the Supreme Court's judgment in HMRC v BlueCrest Capital Management (UK) LLP, handed down on 1 July [Editor Note: Unverified figure - check against HMRC guidance]. The court found that the firm's traders were paid on their own results. The firm's overall profit only set an upper limit on that pay.
In plain terms, pay based on your own performance counts as salary-type pay, not a real share of the firm's profits. Tax lawyers warn that firms shouldn't assume HMRC will keep accepting the way they have treated members in the past.
The Three Salaried Member Conditions
Under the salaried members rules in Sections 863A to 863G of the Income Tax (Trading and Other Income) Act 2005, you're treated as an employee if you meet all three conditions. The first is that at least 80% of your expected pay is fixed or doesn't depend on the LLP's overall profits or losses.
The second is that you don't have significant influence over how the LLP is run. The third is that your capital contribution (the personal money you've put into the firm) is less than 25% of your expected "disguised salary", which means the pay that doesn't depend on overall profits.