HMRC Reviews Suspension Of 23,500 Child Benefit Claims

HMRC Reviews Suspension Of 23,500 Child Benefit Claims
Charlotte Baroukh

Charlotte Baroukh

Tax Expert @ Pie

3 min read

Updated: 10 Nov 2025

3 min read

Updated: 10 Nov 2025

Background to the Benefit Suspension

Child benefit is a payment provided to eligible parents and guardians in the UK, subject to residency requirements. Traditionally, claimants lose eligibility if they spend more than eight consecutive weeks outside the country. In recent months, HMRC trialled a scheme to automate the detection of claimants living abroad by harnessing Home Office travel records.


Under this new policy, benefit suspensions were triggered when travel data appeared to show claimants had left the country for extended periods. Many individuals, however, reported their payments were suspended after brief trips abroad, contradicting the intent of the policy.

Use of Travel Data in Fraud Crackdown

The government's anti-fraud initiative aimed to safeguard public funds, targeting an estimated saving of £350 million over five years. By cross-checking benefit claims with international travel movements, HMRC sought to identify and prevent fraudulent claims where recipients were no longer UK residents.


During the pilot phase of the project, analysis of Home Office data led to thousands of claimants being flagged for possible emigration. However, subsequent investigations revealed significant inaccuracies, with nearly half of those flagged still residing in the UK.

Complaints Prompt Review of Policy

The bulk suspension of payments generated a substantial number of grievances from affected individuals. Families who travelled abroad temporarily for holidays returned to discover their child benefit had been stopped.


These issues were particularly notable in border regions, including Northern Ireland. Following the rise in complaints, HMRC announced it was reconsidering all currently affected cases. The tax authority assured the public that processes would be improved to prevent the recurrence of unjustified suspensions.

Issues Identified in Northern Ireland

The discrepancies in suspension decisions were first highlighted in Northern Ireland. Here, families who left and re-entered the UK through the Republic of Ireland were disproportionately affected. During the pilot, 129 families were flagged by the system as having emigrated, although only 28 had actually left the UK for sufficient durations to lose eligibility.


Further analysis revealed that, overall, 78 per cent of Northern Irish families identified by the system were wrongly flagged as non-resident. Nationwide, it was found that 46 per cent of families whose payments were suspended were incorrectly suspected of fraud.

Government Response and Policy Changes

In response to these findings, HMRC has made immediate adjustments to its procedures. The agency has ceased using travel data from Dublin Airport in its assessments, recognizing the complexities of the Common Travel Area between the UK and Ireland. Additionally, claimants now receive a one-month notice period in which they can respond before any payment suspension is enacted. A spokesperson for HMRC said: 'We are very sorry to those whose payments have been suspended incorrectly.


We have taken immediate action to update the process, giving customers one month to respond before payments are suspended. We remain committed to protecting taxpayers' money and are confident that the majority of suspensions are accurate.'

Oversight and Future Safeguards

The Treasury Select Committee has taken an active interest in the situation, requesting explanations from HMRC and pressing for assurances that similar occurrences will not be repeated. The agency has pledged to cross-reference travel data with PAYE records and to communicate directly with claimants before taking any action to suspend payments.


HMRC's commitment to transparency and improved accuracy aims to restore confidence in the benefit system, ensuring only those genuinely ineligible have payments stopped while safeguarding support for the majority of families.

Final Summary

The review of 23,500 suspended child benefit claims follows widespread concerns regarding the government's use of travel data to detect potential fraud. While the anti-fraud measures were intended to protect public funds, significant flaws in the identification process led to numerous families having their payments incorrectly suspended. Changes to HMRC procedures, including increased oversight and claimant engagement, are expected to address these issues and prevent future errors.


For families and taxpayers, these developments underscore the importance of robust safeguards in public benefit administration. Users seeking further updates on benefit changes or government policy may find the Pie app a useful resource.

Want to get smarter about taxes?

The Tax Pible has tax tips, guides, video tutorials, and expert insights.


Stay up to date with the latest tax news and watch the UKs first tax podcast - the Piecast

Want to get smarter about taxes?
Whatsapp Pie Tax